This is the minimum type of collections system which must be in place on which the aspects described in this resource can be implemented.
Identifiers are assigned within the CMS metadata for physical items and/or digital objects. The identifiers are not necessarily globally unique, machine readable or resolvable.
This is what most organisations use now. The identifiers could be accession numbers, archive reference number, barcodes, internal database identifiers, etc. The same identifiers might be used in different systems but there is no computer interaction between the systems using the identifier.
The identifiers often only work across one type of collection, e.g. you cannot search the museum CMS using the archive reference number.
Any museum with a CMS such as Axiell Collections, TMS, EMu, or any others on this list will meet this baseline level. Archives using a management system such as Calm, or libraries using a system such as Aleph or Alma would also meet this level.
Consult the different aspects, from here you may want to look at Including PIDs from elsewhere within your metadata or Identifiers as links with no commitment to persistence.
We value your feedback on this resource. Any suggestions on the content or additional examples would be welcome.
To submit feedback, you can raise an issue via Github (requires an account) or you can use the Feedback button in the bottom right of each screen.
These systems meet that baseline implementation.